California faces major decision on dams

several dams under consideration do not have quite the same scenic or recreational pull as the Stanislaus River. Memories of landscapes lost behind dams die hard, though. River advocates point to the flooding of picturesque Hetch Hetchy Valley for San Francisco’s water interests and Friant Dam’s catastrophic effect on salmon in the San Joaquin River.

Dams “make sense if you don’t care about taking care of the natural world,” according to Ronald Stork, senior policy advocate for Friends of the River.

These days, however, the debate has shifted to the economics of dam building.

Zito notes that California already has upward of 1,000 dams that provide water supply, flood control, and hydropower — built on the most productive and accessible sites, experts say. Each time another dam is added to a river, billions are spent and the water supplied is minimal.

We have to look further than this reflexive, historical impulse that says building dams will solve all our problems,” said Assemblyman Jared Huffman, D-San Rafael. “It’s not true. Water recycling, conservation, efficiency… dwarf the amount of water we could get through any (reservoirs) we build.”

Reasonable compromise
Conservatives and their supporters however, think they have forged a reasonable compromise that, though expensive, will add an important tool for managing the state’s water system.

The magnitude of the problem is so enormous that we can’t afford to say no to one solution,” said Chris Scheuring, environmental attorney for the California Farm Bureau.

Scheuring’s group and others stand behind three big projects they argue would not inflict the environmental harm of past dams: The expansion of Los Vaqueros Reservoir in Contra Costa County, the Temperance Flat dam on the San Joaquin River above Friant Dam, and Sites Reservoir, which would flood the Antelope Valley in Colusa County.

The $3.8 billion Sites proposal, in particular, marks a departure from the norm because it is an off-stream reservoir that does not obstruct a river. Through canals connected to the Sacramento River, the Department of Water Resources says, water would be pumped into the lake where it would be used to supplement flows into the delta or allow deeper, colder reservoirs to hold back water for critical salmon runs.

Reservoir supporters say Sites presents the best of all worlds. And they seem determined to ensure that Sites and similar projects make it into any water legislation package.

We’re not going to approve another water bond package for billions that haven’t improved water reliability,” said state Sen. Dave Cogdill, R-Modesto. “These are not high dams on wild and scenic rivers. We’re talking about a very responsible approach.”

Not worth it?
Peter Gleick, president of Oakland’s Pacific Institute, a nonpartisan water think tank, acknowledges that Sites or Temperance Flat could add a certain amount of flexibility to the system. But, he says, that slight improvement simply isn’t worth the economic, environmental and political cost. “Many of dams we built in the last century brought us great benefit,” Gleick said. “But I think the era of new dams is over in California.”