Nuclear mattersNuclear power making a come back

Published 4 October 2010

If Germany, where most of the public is suspicious of nuclear power, plans to extend the life of its nuclear reactors, the world must have entered a new atomic age; indeed: around the world, more than 150 reactors with a total net capacity of almost 170,000 megawatts are planned and more than 340 more are proposed, according to the World Nuclear Association

The Three Mile Island nuclear power plant // Source: rinnovabili.it

If Germany, where most of the public is suspicious of nuclear power, plans to extend the life of its nuclear reactors (“Germany to extend life of nuclear reactors,” 7 September 2010 HSNW), the world must have entered a new atomic age.

Jonathan Berr writes that around the world, more than 150 reactors with a total net capacity of almost 170,000 megawatts are planned and more than 340 more are proposed, according to the World Nuclear Association. In Germany, there are proposals for twenty new reactors and as many as eight are expected to be on-line by 2020.

Under the proposal by German chancellor Angela Merkel, “seven reactors built before 1980 will be allowed to operate for eight years past the current 2022 deadline to phase out nuclear power, set by a previous government, and 10 newer plants may operate up to 14 years longer,” the Wall Street Journal reports. The Greens are horrified because they fear — with some justification — that these deadlines will be extended ad infinitum.

As is the case with the United States, Germany will not be able to break free of nuclear power anytime soon. According to the CIA World Fact Book, Germany is the second-largest consumer of natural gas in the world and the seventh-largest consumer of electricity. Germany also is dependent on Russia for its supplies of natural gas, something which must give Merkel sleepless nights.

Berr notes that with natural gas prices remaining high and continued pressure from governments to crack down on greenhouse gas emissions, the allure of nuclear power only grows stronger.

Moreover, U.S. power plant owners were able to refinance their debt at lower interest rates making reactors more competitive than they ever have been in their history. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has approved 126 uprates totaling some 5,600 megawatts since 1977, a few of them of up to 20 percent.

Even old plants are getting new leases on life. In February, President Barack Obama announced the U.S. government would offer $8.3 billion in loan guarantees to build the first new American nuclear reactors in more than three decades. France is already in the forefront of the industry, obtaining more than 75 percent of its power from reactors. The percentage in Germany is 28 percent and 20 percent in the United States.

 

American nuclear plants have gained favor for years. Last year, the NRC extended the license of Exelon Corp.’s Oyster Creek plant in New Jersey, the oldest U.S. commercial reactor, by 20 years. Berr writes that Chicago-based Exelon is balking at efforts by state regulators to mandate that cooling towers be built. A deal will probably be worked out because there is too much money at stake.

As Germany illustrates, there is no nirvana when it comes to energy sources. Any country serious about cutting greenhouse gases has no other alternatives but to consider nuclear,” Berr concludes. “The one caveat is that the industry has to be tightly regulated. Too often lax management has lead to bad outcomes for shareholders and consumers. That’s one reason German plan faces legal challenges.”