Mobile networksFCC explores grating local police authority to shut off mobile networks

Published 6 March 2012

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is currently seekingpublic comment on whether it is appropriate for law enforcement agencies to shut down cell phone networks

The U.S. Federal Communications Commission (FCC) is currently seeking public comment on whether it is appropriate for law enforcement agencies to shut down cell phone networks.

The case stems from the controversial decision by California’s Bay Area Rapid Transit (BART) police to shut off mobile phone service in the name of public safety. Last August, the local law enforcement agency switched off phone service in subway stations for several hours in an effort to prevent a protest from occurring. Organizers of the protest had planned to block subway cars from moving following the fatal shooting of a passenger by BART police.

BART’s decision to shut off cell phone coverage sparked a firestorm of controversy and additional protests. Further inciting protestors, the decision by BART came shortly after leaders in Egypt and Iran had shut off cell phone and Internet access to curb protests there.

Critics of shutting down cell phone service say it violates the Constitution and is potentially dangerous. In its request for comments, the FCC was careful to note that 70 percent of all 911 calls now come from cell phones.

Meanwhile some supporters of authorizing law enforcement agencies to shut off cell phone service argue that terrorists can use mobile phones to trigger bombs or organize violent flash mobs.

Julius Genachowski, the chairman of the FCC, said the agency is committed to ensuring that mobile networks remain open and fair.

Our democracy, our society, and our safety all require communications networks that are available and open,” Genachowski said in a statement. “Any interruption of wireless services raises serious legal and policy issues, and must meet a very high bar.”

In its request for comments, the FCC asked several questions including hen would it be appropriate for agencies to interrupt service?; what risks to the public could be caused by interrupted service?; and could mobile carriers allow customers to still dial 911 if other service was shut down?

All comments in the first round are due by 30 April.