AI Detects “Foreign-Linked Opinion Manipulation” in 110 Million News Comments
The model does not stop at simply labeling an account as suspicious. It also highlights the specific phrases in the comments that served as the basis for its judgment. The team further combined this with multidimensional behavioral-pattern analysis, including account activity frequency, account lifespan, and activity links with other suspected accounts. As a result, among approximately 4 million Naver News users, the model ultimately identified 23,998 accounts exhibiting patterns consistent with suspected public-opinion manipulation.
The analysis also revealed the more subtle strategy of these suspected accounts. Their main target was not the victory of a particular political camp, but rather the maximization of division and confrontation within Korean society.
Among the top 10 targets that drew the highest public engagement, measured through likes and other reactions, seven were prominent domestic political figures. Notably, the attacks were not concentrated on a single party or ideology. Former and current presidents, presidential candidates, and political parties from both progressive and conservative camps were targeted across the spectrum. According to the research team, this suggests a sophisticated strategy aimed not so much at supporting a particular group, but at inflaming domestic political conflict and increasing social distrust and polarization.
This study is significant because it provides data-based evidence for influence-operation activity that had previously been discussed largely in terms of suspicion, while also offering a potential defense mechanism for protecting healthy online public discourse. In the future, portal platforms and related organizations could use this technology during elections or national crises to monitor the influx of suspicious accounts in real time and prioritize the review of coordinated attacks against domestic political figures. However, the research team emphasized that the AI should not be used to block accounts indiscriminately, but rather as an explainable content-moderation tool that supports the judgment of expert reviewers.
To overcome this limitation, the research team used 70 foreign-linked accounts previously identified by the Institute for National Security Strategy as starting points. They then tracked groups of accounts connected to them or repeatedly commenting on the same news articles, ultimately collecting and analyzing a large-scale dataset of 110 million comments posted on Naver News over a 20-year period from 2006 to 2025.
In particular, the AI developed by the research team examines accounts through a careful three-step process. First, it checks whether there are clues suggesting that the author may be linked to a foreign source. Second, it examines whether the comment contains emotionally polarizing expressions, such as moral condemnation or blind praise. Third, it identifies which country or target the emotional framing is directed toward.
The model does not stop at simply labeling an account as suspicious. It also highlights the specific phrases in the comments that served as the basis for its judgment. The team further combined this with multidimensional behavioral-pattern analysis, including account activity frequency, account lifespan, and activity links with other suspected accounts. As a result, among approximately 4 million Naver News users, the model ultimately identified 23,998 accounts exhibiting patterns consistent with suspected public-opinion manipulation.
The analysis also revealed the more subtle strategy of these suspected accounts. Their main target was not the victory of a particular political camp, but rather the maximization of division and confrontation within Korean society.
Among the top 10 targets that drew the highest public engagement, measured through likes and other reactions, seven were prominent domestic political figures. Notably, the attacks were not concentrated on a single party or ideology. Former and current presidents, presidential candidates, and political parties from both progressive and conservative camps were targeted across the spectrum. According to the research team, this suggests a sophisticated strategy aimed not so much at supporting a particular group, but at inflaming domestic political conflict and increasing social distrust and polarization.
This study is significant because it provides data-based evidence for influence-operation activity that had previously been discussed largely in terms of suspicion, while also offering a potential defense mechanism for protecting healthy online public discourse. In the future, portal platforms and related organizations could use this technology during elections or national crises to monitor the influx of suspicious accounts in real time and prioritize the review of coordinated attacks against domestic political figures. However, the research team emphasized that the AI should not be used to block accounts indiscriminately, but rather as an explainable content-moderation tool that supports the judgment of expert reviewers.
