OUR PICKSAI, Autonomy, and the Risk of Nuclear War | Data Brokers to “Go Around” Sanctuary Laws | Unnoticed China Threat, and more

Published 30 July 2022

·  AI, Autonomy, and the Risk of Nuclear War

·  How Six States Could Overturn the 2024 Election

·  The China Threat Our Politicians Don’t Seem to Have Noticed

·  CHIPS Act Clears Congress, Ensuring $52 Billion Boost to U.S. Foundries 

·  Senior European Parliament Member Targeted as Spyware Abuse Spreads

·  ICE’s Use of Data Brokers to “Go Around” Sanctuary Laws Under Fire

·  Election Deniers Are Running to Control Voting. Here’s How They’ve Fared So Far

·  Georgia’s Big Trump Election Investigation, Explained

AI, Autonomy, and the Risk of Nuclear War  (James Johnson, War on the Rocks)
Will emerging technologies like AI increase the risk of nuclear war? We are in an era of rapid disruptive technological change, especially in AI. Therefore, the nascent journey to reorient military forces to prepare for the future digitized battlefield is no longer merely speculation or science fiction. AI technology” is already fused into military machines, and global armed forces are well advanced in their planning, research and development, and, in many cases, deployment of AI-enabled capabilities.
AI does not exist in a vacuum. In isolation, AI is unlikely to be a strategic game changer. Instead, it will likely reinforce the destabilizing effects of advanced weaponry, thereby increasing the speed of war and compressing the decision-making timeframe. The inherently destabilizing effects of military AI may exacerbate tension between nuclear-armed powers, especially China and the United States, but not for the reasons you may think.

How Six States Could Overturn the 2024 Election  (Barton Gellman, The Atlantic)

The Supreme Court may let state legislatures decide the presidency.

The China Threat Our Politicians Don’t Seem to Have Noticed (Charles Parton, The Spectator)
The Chinese Communist party can congratulate itself on another sign of its rise: for the first time it has become a factor in deciding the fate of British politics. During Monday’s televised leadership debates, Liz Truss and Rishi Sunak tried to appeal to Tory members by outdoing each other on their commitment to protect our national security, economic prosperity, data privacy and values from the CCP.
They both referred to Chinese theft of our science and technology, but the problem is much, much wider than that. What is more serious is our blithe willingness to import Chinese control into the most sensitive areas of our economy and society.
Neither aspiring prime minister mentioned the most crucial area – more crucial than 5G and Huawei. Our politicians have eventually got their minds around the threat in telecoms. They may even have grasped the importance of semiconductors. But they ignore the internet of things (IoT). There is still time to wake up – just.