A More Efficient Way to Extract Lithium from Mining Sites, Oil Fields, Used Batteries

The research is published in the journal ACS Applied Materials and Interfaces. A related second paper, concurrently published in The Journal of Physical Chemistry C, explored the stability of delithiation under various conditions.

Aluminum hydroxide exists in four highly ordered crystalline polymorphs and one amorphous, or disordered, form. Form turns out to play a big role in the sorbent’s function.

Kumar traveled to Arizona State University to work with Alexandra Navrotsky to measure thermodynamics of chemical reactions. ORNL Corporate Fellow Bruce Moyer, a renowned expert in separation science and technology, provided insight into the kinetic experiments. 

“Based on calorimetric measurements, we learned that amorphous aluminum hydroxide is the least stable form among aluminum hydroxides and thus is highly reactive,” said Kumar. “That was a key to this method resulting in greater lithium extraction capacity.”

Because amorphous aluminum hydroxide is the least stable among the mineral’s forms, it spontaneously reacts with lithium from brine leached from waste clays. “Only when we did the measurements did we realize that the amorphous form is way, way, way less stable. That is why it is more reactive,” Kumar said. “To gain stability, it reacts very quickly compared to other forms.”

Kumar is optimizing the process by which the sorbent selectively adsorbs lithium from liquids containing lithium, sodium and potassium and goes on to form LDH sulfate. 

At the Center for Nanophase Materials Sciences, a DOE Office of Science user facility at ORNL, the researchers used scanning electron microscopy to characterize the morphology of aluminum hydroxide during lithiation. It is a charged neutral layer that contains atomic vacancies, or tiny holes. Lithium is absorbed at these sites. The size of these vacancies is the key to aluminum hydroxide’s selectivity for lithium, which is a positively charged ion, or cation. 

“That vacant site is so small that it can fit only cations the size of lithium,” Kumar said. ”Sodium and potassium are cations with larger radii. The bigger cations don’t fit into the vacant site. However, it’s a perfect match for lithium.”

The selectivity of amorphous aluminum hydroxide for lithium results in near-perfect efficiency. In a single step, the process captured 37 milligrams of lithium per gram of recoverable sorbent — approximately five times more than a crystalline form of aluminum hydroxide called gibbsite, which was previously employed for lithium extraction. The first step of lithiation extracts 86% of the lithium in the leachate, or brine, from mining sites or oil fields. Running the leachate through the amorphous aluminum hydroxide sorbent a second time picks up the rest of the lithium. “In two steps, you can fully recover the lithium,” Paranthaman said.

Venkat Roy and Fu Zhao at Purdue University analyzed life cycle benefits of a circular economy from direct lithium extraction. They compared the ORNL process to a standard method using sodium carbonate. They found the ORNL technology used one-third the material and one-third the energy and subsequently generated fewer greenhouse gas emissions. 

Next, the researchers want to extend the process to extract more lithium and regenerate the sorbent in a specific form. Now, when the amorphous aluminum hydroxide sorbent reacts with the lithium and is later treated with hot water to remove the lithium and regenerate the sorbent, the result is a structural change in the aluminum hydroxide polymorph from amorphous to a crystalline form called bayerite. 

“The bayerite form is less reactive,” Kumar said. “It requires either more time — 18 hours — or more concentrated lithium for it to react, as opposed to the amorphous form, which reacts within 3 hours to pick all the lithium from the leachate solution. We need to find a route to get back to the amorphous phase, which we know is highly reactive.”

Success in optimizing the new process for extraction speed and efficiency could be a game-changer for the domestic lithium supply. More than half of the world’s land-based lithium reserves are in places where the concentration of dissolved minerals is high, such as California’s Salton Sea or oil fields in Texas and Pennsylvania.

“Domestically, we don’t really have lithium manufacturing,” Paranthaman said. “Less than 2% of lithium for manufacturing is from North America. If we can use the new ORNL process, we have various lithium sources all over the United States. The sorbent is so good you can use it for any brines or even solutions from recycled lithium-ion batteries.”

For the first paper, DOE’s Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technology Office, formerly Advanced Manufacturing Office, of the Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy, or EERE, funded initial research through the Critical Materials Innovation Hub, or CMI, which was established to diversify supply, develop substitutes, improve reuse and recycling and conduct crosscutting research of critical materials. ORNL has provided strategic direction for these areas since CMI began in 2013. Since September 2023, EERE’s Vehicle Technologies Office has funded the work through ReCell, its first advanced battery recycling R&D center.

For the second paper, DOE’s Advanced Materials and Manufacturing Technology Office funded the research through the CMI. The synthesis of LDH sorbents was supported by EERE’s Office of Geothermal Technologies through a Technology Commercialization Fund.

UT-Battelle manages ORNL for DOE’s Office of Science. The single largest supporter of basic research in the physical sciences in the United States, the Office of Science is working to address some of the most pressing challenges of our time. For more information, please visit energy.gov/science. — Dawn Levy