What Are the Risks of Hydrogen Vehicles in Tunnels?
Three Hazard Scenarios
The most likely outcome of an accident involving an FCEV is that there will be no significant impact from the hydrogen. However, three different hazard scenarios can occur in the event of serious accidents. In the first case, the thermal pressure relief device (TPRD) is triggered when the pressure rises as a result of a thermal impact (e.g. vehicle fire), releasing the hydrogen from the tank in a controlled jet. This keeps the pressure at a certain level and prevents the tank from rupturing. If the discharged hydrogen ignites – which can easily happen when mixed with air -, the flame is directed towards the ground. Nevertheless, it remains dangerous because hydrogen burns without color or odor, but the danger zone is limited. If the TPRD fails, the tank can explode, creating a blast wave that spreads through the entire tunnel. Up to approx. 30 meters there is a risk of death, up to approx. 300 meters there is a risk of serious internal injuries such as bleeding to the lungs, and further away there is still a risk of ruptured eardrums.
The third scenario is the least likely. It occurs when the hydrogen is released without being ignited. As the lightest element in the periodic table, hydrogen rises and collects in a cloud under the tunnel ceiling. If there is an ignition source there (e.g. hot lamps or an electrical impulse starting a fan), a hydrogen cloud explosion follows, which also causes a blast wave.
Less Speed and Sufficient Distance
“Our investigations have shown that although the hazard scenarios involving hydrogen vehicles are relatively unlikely, they harbor great potential for damage. Modern hydrogen tanks are built so safely that a lot has to go wrong for the hydrogen to escape,” says Daniel Fruhwirt from the Institute of Thermodynamics and Sustainable Propulsion Systems at TU Graz. “In addition, the transport infrastructure in Austrian tunnels probably fulfils the strictest requirements in Europe. Since we only have one operator for all motorway and highway tunnels, the safety level is also very homogeneous. In terms of infrastructure, there is hardly any risk of damage to the tunnel structure, but accidents would be dangerous for people.”
To minimize the risks, Daniel Fruhwirt and his project team have recommended several measures. Stricter speed limits that are monitored with section control, precise distance controls that signal to drivers when they are following too closely, and speed limits that are displayed earlier in traffic jams so that the speed is already low enough when arriving at the end of the jam to cause only minor damage in the event of a rear-end collision. “What has already been implemented in most EU member states as a result of the serious events at the end of the 1990s and early 2000s, is that all tunnels on motorways and highways with a length of more than 500 meters are twin-tube tunnels and are generally no longer used for bi-directional traffic. This reduces the risk considerably,” explains Daniel Fruhwirt.
The research findings were presented at The 12th International Conference on Tunnel Safety and Ventilation (TSV 2024), which was held in Graz from April 16–18.
Falko Schoklitsch is with media relations at Technische Universität Graz. The article was originally posted to the website of Technische Universität Graz
