Seismic noiseSeismic Background Noise Drastically Reduced Due to COVID-19 Lockdown Measures
Global COVID-19 “lockdown” measures - the quarantines, physical isolation, travel restrictions and widespread closures of services and industry that countries around the world have implemented in 2020 - resulted in a months-long reduction in global seismic noise by up to 50 percent, representing the longest and most prominent global seismic noise reduction in recorded history.
Global COVID-19 “lockdown” measures - the quarantines, physical isolation, travel restrictions and widespread closures of services and industry that countries around the world have implemented in 2020 - resulted in a months-long reduction in global seismic noise by up to 50 percent, representing the longest and most prominent global seismic noise reduction in recorded history.
As with earthquakes and other geophysical processes and events, humans are a major source of seismic signals detected by seismometers worldwide. Everyday human activity - from our involvement in industrial processes and construction projects to our raucous outbursts at football stadiums - generates vibrations in the earth that are recorded as a near-continuous stream of high-frequency seismic waves. The AAAS notes that, in general, this seismic noise closely tracks with human behavior; it’s typically stronger during the day than at night and weaker on weekends and holidays than it is on typical weekdays. However, the nature of global anthropogenic seismic noise remains relatively understudied. What’s more, the complex high-frequency background signal it produces limits the ability of seismic warning networks to detect the more discrete signals associated with local geologic hazards like earthquakes.
This year, disruptions to human activity during various COVID-19 emergency measures presented a unique opportunity to evaluate human-induced seismicity. Thomas Lecocq and colleagues compiled seismic observations from 268 seismic stations around the world and found a near-global reduction in high-frequency seismic ambient noise, which began in China in late January 2020 and was followed by the same phenomenon in Europe and the rest of the world in March to April.
“The noise level we observe during lockdowns lasted longer and was often quieter than the Christmas to New Year period,” the authors write.
The global spread of the quieting was closely correlated to when lockdown measures went into effect in countries around the world. In total, global anthropogenic seismic noise dropped by as much as 50 percent during March to May. Not only do the results help constrain the seismic impact of human activity and its unique signals, the “2020 seismic noise quiet period” allowed the researchers to detect subtle and often obscured seismic signals from subsurface sources, which could help disentangle anthropogenic noise and natural processes.
Finally, the research revealed that anthropogenic seismic wavefields affect larger areas than previously thought, a finding supported by the correlations with independent mobility data. In contrast to mobility data, though, publicly available data from existing seismometer networks has fewer potential privacy concerns. Thus, note the authors, it could be an alternative for near-real-time monitoring of anthropogenic activity patterns.