How Emotions Influence How People Deal with Natural Disasters

While fear is an important motivator of community action in response to climate change, it isn’t the only factor, the researchers found.

“Most disaster-management and climate-change policies and programs are based on the assumption that people are – or should be – afraid of perils,” Lizarralde noted. “This fear is often seen as a lever for prompting preventive action, such as getting people to reinforce their houses, relocate to less exposed areas or take out insurance.

“Our study shows this approach works, but only up to a point. In Carahatas, people do fear flooding, but other concerns also come into play. For example, people worry about the economic consequences of moving: will they lose their job, will their financial situation deteriorate? These uncertainties carry as much, if not more, weight than the climate risks themselves.”

Crime and Unemployment also Factors
Similarly, residents of Yumbo and Salgar expressed fears, but these were more focused on crime, violence and unemployment than on natural hazards. Anxiety was also widespread.

The refusal to relocate in the face of climate change isn’t due only to fear and anxiety, the researchers found. Other emotions come into play, such as anger at the authorities, the connection to the land and appreciation of the beauty of the natural environment. Distrust of institutions, compounded by a sense of abandonment, explains why many reject proposed solutions such as temporary housing or forced relocation.

Another key factor is pride. In communities often plagued by poverty and lack of resources, residents have built their homes – and even parts of their neighborhood infrastructure – themselves. Though imperfect, these achievements give them a sense of dignity.

“People know their roofs leak or their foundations are unstable, but that doesn’t mean they want to tear them down or leave,” said Lizarralde. “They’re proud of what they’ve accomplished.”

This pride is not always understood by decision-makers and professionals, who judge villagers’ dwellings through the lens of external standards, he added.

“They arrive with prejudices, thinking that these shantytowns are unfit for living and that people should move to new apartments elsewhere. But study after study has shown that such initiatives fail. People sometimes accept the new homes, but it’s not what they really want.”

‘Keep Repeating Flawed Practices’
Failure to understand the emotions and real needs of communities can lead to inappropriate policies, Lizarralde added. “Until we take the time to understand people’s emotions and their attachment to the land, we will keep repeating these flawed practices.”

The study highlights the importance of factoring emotions into disaster risk-reduction policies and climate-change response strategies, the researchers believe. Emotions play a critical role in building the legitimacy, trust and empathy required for collective mobilization, they argue.

“To act more effectively, whether in Cuba, Colombia or here in Quebec, we must pay attention to our own emotions and those of policymakers,” said Lizarralde. “Emotions influence decision-making about floods, wildfires and shoreline erosion. The 2017 and 2019 floods in Quebec are a good example.”

Virginie Soffer is a journalist at the University of Montreal. The article was originally posted to the website of the University of Montreal.