Terrorist watch-listPressure continues to remove MEK from terrorist watch-list

Published 10 April 2012

Prominent former U.S. officials who support the removal of the Iranian opposition group MEK  from the U.S. Department of State terrorist watch-list bristle at the despite indirect warnings from the U.S. Treasury Department that their support for the group could constitute a crime

A group of former U.S. officials say they refuse to abandon their support for the People’s Mujahedin of Iran (PMOI/MEK) and their efforts to have the group removed from the State Department’s terrorist list. These former officials note that they continue to support the delisting of the MEK despite indirect warnings from the U.S. Treasury Department that their support for the group could constitute a crime.

I never knew obtaining a subpoena from your own government would be so much fun,” former Pennsylvania governor Ed Rendell told a gathering of nearly 1,000 at an event to commemorate the first anniversary of an attack by Iraqi military forces against Iranian citizens in the Camp Ashraf in Iraq, where thirty-six were killed and hundreds wounded. “On the one hand we’re being investigated by the Treasury Department… for contact with the MEK, (but) the State Department asked us to have contact with the MEK. Can someone explain that to me?”

An Iranian American Community of Northern California release reports that Harvard Law professor Alan Dershowitz, referring to the media reports on the Treasury’s potential probe of a number of the prominent Americans who have spoken out about what speakers at the event described as the failure of the United States to protect Iranian dissidents at Camp Ashraf and the need to delist the MEK, said, “It’s a tragedy that we have had to place our own sacred honor at risk by supporting humanitarian cause, the saving of innocent lives and obligation of our government to keep its commitments.” “I never thought I would live to see the day when my own country… threatens its own citizens who speak up on behalf of law, justice, and humanitarian obligations of the United States.”

Up here on the dais with me…we have some of America’s most distinguished public servants, most decorated military officers, and most respected diplomats,” said Ambassador Mitchell Reiss, who served as Policy Planning director under former Secretary of State Colin L. Powell.

We come together today at a time when some people in the U.S. Government are trying to intimidate us…our presence here…is a rebuke to those who oppose this cause,” Reiss who moderated the event added. “We will not be intimidated, discouraged, and we will not be silenced.”

I want to say with all of my heart and sincerity that I was advised by my friends in the administration not to be here today,” said Ambassador Marc Ginsberg, the former U.S. ambassador to Morocco, adding, “Why are they leaking inflammatory and inappropriate information about the rights of the people sitting up here today to speak their minds even if they were being paid to leave their offices and to spend time before you. Are they trying to shoot the messenger because they don’t like the message?”

Referring to the writ of mandamus submitted to the Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia by the MEK counsel, Attorney General Michael Mukasey said, “The State Department can do all the conduct in foreign relations that it wants, but it can’t put anybody on the list or keep anybody on the list unless they qualify.  And I think, as a piece of friendly advice, it is ill-advised to tell a court that it is none of their business.  I suggest to you that they will find out soon enough that it is the business of a court.”

We had seen within the past weeks Secretary Clinton say that the conduct of the MEK in transferring residents from Ashraf to Camp Liberty would be a factor in deciding whether the MEK would stay on the list of foreign terrorist organizations… Another fundamentally political point,” the former U.S. ambassador to the United Nations John Bolton said. “If the original designation was bad and it was, and if the decision in 2008 to continue the listing was worse, this is worst of all.”

I think we all have to be very vigilant and this is a real test for the United Nations as to what UNHCR does at Camp Liberty…there should be an evaluation of what can be done at the Security Council to push and accelerate the process to repatriating our colleagues and family members and friends in Camp Liberty,” former U.S. ambassador for special political affairs, Stuart Holliday, said.

Former Marine Corps commandant General James Conway and former chief judge of the United States Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces Eugene Sullivan questioned the designation of the MEK and underscored the need to fulfill America’s promise to protect the residents of Camp Ashraf until they are resettled in third countries.

The release notes that the MEK formally renounced violence in 2001, and voluntarily disarmed when U.S. forces arrived at Camp Ashraf in 2003.