Perspective: The authoritarian challengeThe Corrupting of Democracy

Published 3 September 2019

Democracies are generally thought to die at the barrel of a gun, in coups and revolutions. These days, however, they are more likely to be strangled slowly in the name of the people. The Economist writes that Hungary offers a cautionary example. Fidesz, the ruling party, has used its parliamentary majority to capture regulators, dominate business, control the courts, buy the media and manipulate the rules for elections. In form, Hungary is a thriving democracy; in spirit, it is a one-party state. The forces at work in Hungary are eating away at other 21st-century polities, too.

Democracies are generally thought to die at the barrel of a gun, in coups and revolutions. These days, however, they are more likely to be strangled slowly in the name of the people.

The Economistwrites that Hungary offers a cautionary example. Fidesz, the ruling party, has used its parliamentary majority to capture regulators, dominate business, control the courts, buy the media and manipulate the rules for elections. As our briefingexplains, the prime minister, Viktor Orban, does not have to break the law, because he can get parliament to change it instead. He does not need secret police to take his enemies away in the night. They can be cut down to size without violence, by the tame press or the taxman. In form, Hungary is a thriving democracy; in spirit, it is a one-party state (see: “How Viktor Orban Hollowed Out Hungary’s Democracy,” Economist, 29 August 2019).

The forces at work in Hungary are eating away at other 21st-century polities, too. This is happening not just in young democracies like Poland, where the Law and Justice party has set out to mimic Fidesz, but even the longest-standing ones like Britain and the United States. These old-established polities are not about to become one-party states, but they are already showing signs of decay. Once the rot sets in, it is formidably hard to stop.

“At the heart of the degradation of Hungarian democracy is cynicism,” says the Economist. “After the head of a socialist government popularly seen as corrupt admitted that he had lied to the electorate in 2006, voters learned to assume the worst of their politicians. Mr. Orban has enthusiastically exploited this tendency. Rather than appeal to his compatriots’ better nature, he sows division, stokes resentment and exploits their prejudices, especially over immigration. This political theatre is designed to be a distraction from his real purpose, the artful manipulation of obscure rules and institutions to guarantee his hold on power.”

Over the past decade, albeit to a lesser degree, the same story has unfolded elsewhere. In a survey last year, over half of voters from eight countries in Europe and North America told the Pew Research Center that they were dissatisfied with how democracy is working. Almost 70 percent of Americans and French people say that their politicians are corrupt.

Populists have tapped into this pool of resentment. They sneer at elites, even if they themselves are rich and powerful; they thrive on, and nurture, anger and division.

“Too much cynicism undermines legitimacy,” the Economist writes. “Cynical politicians denigrate institutions, then vandalize them.”

The magazine adds:

Fortunately, there is a lot of ruin in a democracy. Neither London nor Washington is about to become Budapest. Power is more diffuse and institutions have a longer history—which will make them harder to capture than new ones in a country of 10m people. Moreover, democracies can renew themselves. American politics was coming apart in the era of the Weathermen and Watergate, but returned to health in the 1980s.