The Appeal of Far-Right Politics

A Social Movement? 
Vienna says that in the public discourse, far-right groups are mostly associated with anti-refugee demonstrations and street protests. But the groups Pasieka studies also engage in activities that they are not commonly associated with. These activities range from socializing events such as hiking in the mountains and organizing festivals to establishing social assistance models for citizens in need – toys for kids or food, for example, as well as support from lawyers and social workers. Far-right groups are engaged in many of these activities also during the current emergency situation provoked by the COVID-19 pandemic, presenting themselves as the people who step in where the state is absent. 

In the public discourse, far-right activists are often portrayed as “driven by hate”. However, in order to attract new members and build their communities, they adopt a different kind of narrative: “They use the notions of friendship, hope, a better future. But of course this relates to their own community and the people they consider legitimate inhabitants of their countries,” Pasieka says. 

Transnational Nationalists
One of the aspects Pasieka looks at is how far-right groups are transnationally connected. Being a “transnational nationalist” is not necessarily a contradiction and it is not a new phenomenon, as fascist groups in the 1920s and 1930s were networking transnationally, too. 

“At the end of the day, there is nothing surprising about this networking. These groups cherish their national identity but they also live in the 21st century and they realize that the world is globalized. They use these connections productively to learn from people in other countries – to observe what others do and implement the same tactics and practices,” Pasieka explains.  

Understanding Different Perspectives
In Italy and Poland, Pasieka got to know members of the far-right organizations on a personal level, which, she says, was challenging at times: “Negotiating access to the field and gaining trust as an anthropologist is really an ongoing process. Ethnographic research is full of ‘ups’ and ‘downs’. It happened to me to say something my research participants got upset about and put my further research into question,” she says. 

However, this problem is more inherent to ethnographic research, generally, than it is inherent to studying far-right activism in particular. While far-right groups do have some specific characteristics, Pasieka is highly critical of marginalizing them and treating them as an “especially troublesome” category of research participants: “We really should not make something very specific of this topic, something very exceptional. This aura of exceptionality is not helpful for understanding it.” 

However difficult it might be to empathize with someone who shares fundamentally different values, taking all parties seriously and understanding their motivation is key in a time in which a refusal to engage with other people’s views has become a feature of political as well as academic debates. Therefore, Pasieka emphasizes that studying far-right groups is not about “liking” or “disliking,” but about understanding what other people think and do.