Our picksPreparing for War with China | Cost of Undoing the Travel Ban | Terrifying Climate Warning, and more

Published 5 February 2021

·  Bipartisan Support Emerges for Domestic-Terror Bills as Experts Warn Threat May Last ‘10 To 20 Years’

·  ‘It Let White Supremacists Organize’: The Toxic Legacy of Facebook’s Groups

·  Frustration Is Spreading Faster Than the Vaccine Is

·  The Terrifying Warning Lurking in the Earth’s Ancient Rock Record

·  Here’s What a Ton of Capitol Rioters Had in Common 

·  The Legal Aspects of Banning Chinese Drone Technology

·  The Hidden Cost of Undoing the Travel Ban

·  The United States and Japan Should Prepare for War with China

·  SolarWinds Cyber Attack Reveals Risks of Accidental Nuclear War

·  You Can’t Blame Russia for Trump

·  The Case for a Third Reconstruction

Bipartisan Support Emerges for Domestic-Terror Bills as Experts Warn Threat May Last ‘10 To 20 Years’ (Karoun Demirjian, Washington Post)
An apparent bipartisan majority of the House Homeland Security Committee on Thursday endorsed the idea of new laws to address domestic terrorism in the wake of last month’s riot at the U.S. Capitol, as experts warned such internal threats would plague the country for decades to come. Elizabeth Neumann, a former assistant secretary of homeland security for counterterrorism during the Trump administration, warned lawmakers that there is a “high likelihood” that another domestic terrorist attack would occur in the coming months and that the problem would persist “for the next 10 to 20 years.” Jonathan Greenblatt, head of the Anti-Defamation League, told lawmakers that Jan. 6 had been a “watershed moment for the white supremacist movement,” and that its adherents viewed the Capitol breach as a “victory.” Their comments came during the committee’s first hearing in its investigation into the riot that has moved House Democrats and 10 Republicans to impeach the now-former president for an unprecedented second time. The panel’s chairman, Rep. Bennie Thompson (D-Miss.), indicated that he expected its probe would result in concrete legislation to punish and dissuade such attacks, and better monitor and regulate the environments in which extremist ideologies proliferate.

It Let White Supremacists Organize’: The Toxic Legacy of Facebook’s Groups (Kari Paul, Guardian)
Mark Zuckerberg, the Facebook CEO, announced last week the platform will no longer algorithmically recommend political groups to users in an attempt to “turn down the temperature” on online divisiveness. But experts say such policies are difficult to enforce, much less quantify, and the toxic legacy of the Groups feature and the algorithmic incentives promoting it will be difficult to erase. “This is like putting a Band-Aid on a gaping wound,” said Jessica J González, the co-founder of the anti-hate speech group Change the Terms. “It doesn’t do enough to combat the long history of abuse that’s been allowed to fester on Facebook.” Facebook launched Groups, a feature that allows people with shared interests to communicate on closed forums, in 2010, but began to make a more concerted effort to promote the feature around 2017 after the Cambridge Analytica scandal cast a shadow on the platform’s Newsfeed. In a long blogpost in 2017 February called Building Global Community, Zuckerberg argued there was “a real opportunity” through groups to create “meaningful social infrastructure in