Forensics Lab Cracks Case on Newer, “Greener” Gunshot Residue
To gather data, the team created new and improved organic and inorganic GSR “reference standards” or methodologies for creating standardized mixes of particles that accurately mirror real-world gunshot residue, allowing different labs to meaningfully compare results.
They applied those particles to fabrics, to the skin and hair of real human volunteers and to an artificial skin product called Strat-M. Then they subjected those surfaces to real and simulated activities like running, struggling, washing and rubbing, before measuring the remaining particles.
Trejos said the experiments established Strat-M as a viable substitute for human skin.
“Artificial skin has been used by fields like pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, health sciences. Now we have proved it can provide a consistent forensic standard while allowing us to test conditions that wouldn’t be feasible or safe for a person’s skin.”
The researchers found inorganic GSR particles persist longer on a surface — a palm, a sweatshirt — than organic compounds, but they’re more susceptible to being lost or transferred by common activities. A shooter who washes their hands with soap and water, then dries them with a paper towel, will likely prevent crime scene investigators from identifying GSR based on analysis of lead, barium and antimony particles on their hands.
The fact that inorganic particles persist over time and are significantly lost only due to outside forces can be critical to questions about whether someone is the victim of a suicide or homicide, Trejos said.
Organic compounds, conversely, may be lost from clothing if a suspect struggles during arrest, but they are less likely to transfer to someone else, like the arresting officer.
Up to 100 characteristic inorganic particles could transfer from one person to another during a handshake, compared to no transfer at all for organic compounds. But unlike inorganic particles, organic particles are lost over time due to factors like evaporation from the skin.
Trejos said the next step is to put the findings to use in combination with another methodology the group recently developed, which allows field CSIs to immediately analyze possible GSR at a crime scene.
As enthusiastic as Trejos is about the research, she emphasizes that real-life CSIs don’t have as many answers as the ones on television.
“Right now, we can do a pretty good job answering the question, ‘Is GSR present or not?’ But the next and more interesting question is, ‘Did this person fire the gun?’ Forensics is not always able to answer that with high certainty. This research opens new avenues to answer questions relevant to a judge or jury.
“By providing faster and more informative investigative tools, we’re helping to apprehend offenders with more solid evidence, and we’re minimizing the potential for false incarcerations.”
