IT securityRussia-Georgia conflict shows new frontier in war

Leaving aside questions about the merits of the arguments advanced by Russia and Georgia with regard to the military clashes between them, the week-long war does offer a window into the the future of warfare. It can be seen by the fact that as Georgian troops retreated in the face of a sustained Russian attack, the Web sites of their government, also under fire, retreated to Google. The Christian Science Monitor’s Ben Arnoldy writes that in an Internet first, Georgia’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs reopened its site on Google’s free Blogger network and gave reporters a Gmail address to reach the National Security Council. The attacks have deluged the Web sites of the president, various ministries, and news agencies with bogus traffic. The jam not only shut down those sites but also clogged Georgia’s Internet access, exposing its reliance on Russian Internet pipelines.

Some in the cybersecurity community say this may be nothing more than grass-roots “hactivism,” which usually springs up during international confrontations. Others, however, warn that the attack highlights the leverage some countries have gained over adversaries by laying down fiber-optic cables and providing cheap Internet services. “The lesson here for Washington is that any modern conflict will include a cyberwarfare component, simply because it’s too inexpensive to be passed up,” says Bill Woodcock, research director at Packet Clearing House, a nonprofit Internet research institute in San Francisco. “The best [defensive] strategy is always preparedness. We’ve spent eight years completely ignoring that, while the Chinese and Indian governments have been paying really close attention and investing many tens of billions of dollars.”

Georgia’s Internet infrastructure has two big weaknesses. First, most of its external connections go through Russia. Second, there is a lack of internal connections called Internet exchange points. So when a Web surfer in Georgia calls up a Georgian Web page, that request routes through another country, which is similar to driving to Mexico to get across town in San Francisco, says Woodcock, whose organization helps countries build their own Internet exchange points. “If you look at how the routing is done on the Internet, there are a few major networks that are providing interconnectivity to everyone else,” says Dmitri Alperovitch, director of intelligence analysis at Secure Computing Corporation, a data-security firm based in San Jose, California.

Arnoldy says that by one count, out of the 192 countries in the world, 110 nations are saddled with the problem. Former