Law enforcementBanning Chokeholds

Published 18 November 2020

George Floyd’s murder was egregious but not unique. Many police agencies hold the position that they don’t train officers to use chokeholds, but they are continuously used by officers to regain compliance. Abrief just released by the Center for Justice Research (CJR) at Texas Southern University offers comprehensive recommendations for key stakeholders, at all levels, to consider in the advancement of police reform in their respective jurisdictions.

The Center for Justice Research(CJR) at Texas Southern University has just released a Police Reform Action Brief released which focuses on the chokehold crisis. CJR notes that this is the first in a series of action briefs on police reform that will assist in the reimagination of policing.

The brief, Reimagining Policing Action Brief: Banning Chokeholdshighlights the extensive history of police officer use of chokeholds and similar tactics that often result in unconsciousness, and even death. The 25 May 2020 death of George Floyd under the knee of a Minneapolis police officer has shaken the nation’s conscience and led to massive racial justice protests across the United States.

The brief’s authors provide support for a zero-tolerance approach to police chokeholds. A chokehold ban will help move this country further toward the elimination of racially motivated police violence and the longstanding tensions and distrust between minority communities and the police.

George Floyd’s murder was egregious but not unique. Many police agencies hold the position that they don’t train officers to use chokeholds, but they are continuously used by officers to regain compliance. In fact, when a New York City police officer applied a chokehold that ultimately killed Eric Garner in 2014, they had already been banned some 21 years earlier. In Minneapolis, it is estimated that between 2015 and 2020, some form of a neck restraint was administered 237 times by police officers, with almost 20 percent of them resulting in unconsciousness.

The Justice Act, put forth by Senator Tim Scott (R-South Carolina), seeks to discourage chokeholds by way of withholding federal funds to those departments that continue their use or refuse to provide accurate data on their department’s use.  The George Floyd Justice in Policing Act, passed by the U.S. House, sets federal standards that prohibit the use of deadly force —including chokeholds — by federal officers except as a last resort to prevent imminent and serious bodily injury following de-escalation techniques. If passed, officers who use chokeholds will be subject to prosecution under federal statute.   

The brief concludes with comprehensive recommendations for key stakeholders, at all levels, to consider in the advancement of police reform in their respective jurisdictions.