Germany Fights Cyberattacks and Fraud Claims to Ensure Fair Election

Thiel was also keen to underline the fact that Germany does not use voting machines, like in the US. “We don’t have a situation with voting machines that we may know from the US. The actual voting procedure at the polling station is old school,” said Thiel. “When I explained to a senior official from the Interior Ministry recently that it works with paper and pencil, he said, ‘that reassures me’.” 

“We have no voting machines — at the end of the day, it’s the ballot paper that gets counted,” he said. Thiel also went on to stress that any citizen has the right to walk in and watch the votes being counted.

Voting systems in both countries have been subject to similar accusations, but are structured differently.

“The biggest difference is having a stable voter register based on the register of residents,” Thiel told DW. Where Americans must actively register to be able to vote, Germany’s system of recording citizens’ place of residence ensures that they are automatically registered. This difference means that voter lists are regularly updated including when people die or move, making it more difficult to falsely add people to them.

Cyber threats — domestic and foreign

According to the authorities, the more present danger to the integrity of German democracy is likely to come from via the internet — particularly foreign state actors attempting to hack parliamentary systems, as happened in 2015. As was widely reported in March this year, several German parliamentarians — both federal and state — received so-called phishing emails to their private accounts, apparently in the hope of obtaining sensitive data.

Since then, there have been over a hundred attacks on Bundestag members by a group named “Ghostwriter,” according to Thomas Haldenwang, head of Germany’s domestic intelligence agency, the BfV. Though Haldenwang was not willing to say so at Wednesday’s press conference, German media has widely reported that Russian intelligence agencies are believed to be behind the attacks. 

“Only in very few cases were these attacks successful,” said Haldenwang. “The people who were attacked were mostly sufficiently aware and did not open the emails. In the few cases where they were successful, we very quickly made contact with those affected and warned them, so that they were able to reset and clean their systems.” Haldenwang said that the BfV had become aware of various waves of attacks.

Opposition parties, meanwhile, have accused the German government of only waking up to the problem of such cyberattacks now. “The fact that the federal interior minister now recognizes the threat comes late, but it’s a step in the right direction,” Green party security policy spokesman Konstantin von Notz said in a statement on Wednesday. “Whether the government will see illegitimate attempts at influence when they take place in time, not to mention whether they will be able to prevent them with the necessary determination, seems doubtful.”

Seehofer, however, remained relatively sanguine on Wednesday, suggesting that the threats from foreign agents were no greater than those from domestic sources — and that they are often difficult to distinguish the two anyway. “Just looking at what is happening from Moscow, what is happening from China, or Iran or other countries — I stress again that we take those very seriously, but we shouldn’t underestimate what is happening inside our country,” he said. “We live in a globalized world and it is often it is very difficult to tell them apart.”

Ben Knight is a DW reporter. Ian Bateson contributed to this report. This article is published courtesy of Deutsche Welle (DW).