GAO's cybercrime report addresses cyber threats, responses

Published 25 July 2007

The FBI estimates that the annual loss due to computer crime was estimated to be $67.2 billion for U.S. organizations; nation-states and terrorists could conduct a coordinated cyber attack to seriously disrupt electric power distribution, air traffic control, and financial sectors; GAO studies the issue

Computer interconnectivity has produced great benefits but has also enabled criminal activity which exploits this very interconnectivity for financial gain and other malicious purposes, such as Internet fraud, child exploitation, identity theft, and terrorism. Efforts to address cybercrime include activities associated with protecting networks and information, detecting criminal activity, investigating crime, and prosecuting criminals. The Government Accountability Office (GAO) has puboished a new study —Cybercrime: Public and Private Entities Face Challenges in Addressing Cyber Threats, aiming to (1) determine the impact of cybercrime on our nation’s economy and security; (2) describe key federal entities, as well as nonfederal and private sector entities, responsible for addressing cybercrime; and (3) determine challenges being faced in addressing cybercrime.

Here are some of the findings from the report:

* Cybercrime has significant economic impacts and threatens U.S. national security interests. Various studies and experts estimate the direct economic impact from cybercrime to be in the billions of dollars annually. The annual loss due to computer crime was estimated to be $67.2 billion for U.S. organizations, according to a 2005 Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) survey.

* In addition, there is continued concern about the threat that U.S. adversaries, including nation-states and terrorists, pose to U.S. national security. For example, intelligence officials have stated that nation-states and terrorists could conduct a coordinated cyber attack to seriously disrupt electric power distribution, air traffic control, and financial sectors.

* Also, according to FBI testimony, terrorist organizations have used cybercrime to raise money to fund their activities. Despite the estimated loss of money and information and known threats from adversaries, the precise impact of cybercrime is unknown because it is not always detected and reported.

* Numerous public and private entities have responsibilities to protect against, detect, investigate, and prosecute cybercrime. The Departments of Justice, Homeland Security, and Defense, and the Federal Trade Commission have prominent roles in addressing cybercrime within the federal government, and state and local law enforcement entities play similar roles at their levels.

* Private entities such as Internet service providers and software developers focus on the development and implementation of technology systems to detect and protect against cybercrime, as well as gather evidence for investigations. In addition, numerous cybercrime partnerships have been established between public sector entities, between public and private sector entities, and internationally, including information-sharing efforts.

* Entities face a number of key challenges in addressing cybercrime, including reporting cybercrime and ensuring that there are adequate analytical capabilities to support law enforcement. While public and private entities, partnerships, and tasks forces have initiated efforts to address these challenges, federal agencies can take additional action to help ensure adequate law enforcement capabilities.