Unusual-looking truck to protect U.K. soldiers

set of requirements: simply change out the design at the back, change out the cab, reconfigure the driveline slightly.”

Expanding on the potential roles of AVA vehicles, Ashworth said: “We can make it for a command-and-control vehicle, with a four-man cab and a work area behind the cab within a secure, protected environment, but you could also just simply have a two-man cab and a flat bed so it could be a straight cargo truck. On the same basis, you could put a fairly small two-man cab at the front with a crew under protection and you could put a recovery system… or a C4I system on the back. If you… put an updated, beefed-up, even armored Jackal-style cab, you could make it a fire-support vehicle, you could make it a reconnaissance vehicle and a protect-and-patrol vehicle.”

Despite the concept’s adaptable nature, Ashworth scotched rumors that the company is working on a so-called ‘extender’ variant: a vehicle that can be converted on the battlefield from 4x4 to 6x6. “The extender is not on our timetable at the moment,” he said. “It could be later on because effectively the 6x6 is an extension, all the component parts are exactly the same, but we’re focusing on developing the 4x4 and the 6x6.”

Much of the underpinning technology is the same as that on the Jackal. Driven by a 300hp Cummins engine, the vehicle employs the same type of space-frame chassis, uses an uprated version of the wheel-independent air-spring suspension system used on the Jackal and also boasts an automatic transmission.

“It is,” said Ashworth, “an evolution from an already in-service vehicle with a proven track record. We’ve just made it a bigger, stronger, more capable vehicle… but it’s very much the same.”

Nevertheless, there are some key differences, not least the vehicle’s most eyebrow-raising characteristic: its V-shaped hull. Ashworth explained that this was specifically designed to help the vehicle occupants survive roadside bomb blasts. “The strange, sloping front was all about the risk of where you put the driver and commander. The traditional forward cab always sits them above the wheels, which is a high-risk strategy. What we’ve done is push the driver and commander inside the wheel so any under-wheel blast will be pushed away.”

While he declined to comment on whether these improvements are a direct result of the problems encountered with the Jackal, Ashworth pointedly emphasized the fact that working alongside Israeli armor specialist Plasan, Lockheed Martin’s engineers took protection as their starting point in design of the cab. “That gives us the edge over the traditional way of doing things,” he claimed. “Because they’re designing the protection solution, they can do it from scratch.”

He added that the vehicle has already fared well in a series of blast tests designed to go beyond the kind of blasts experienced by existing vehicles.

Lockheed Martin is now working with a number of partners to further the design. Some of these, such as Babcock Marine and Marshall Aerospace, are familiar faces in the defense industry. But as Lockheed U.K. is new to land-vehicle design, it’s also tapping into automotive expertise from beyond the military realm. Although he declined to reveal the identity of these industrial collaborators, Ashworth did comment generally on what can be learned from the car industry. “We need to learn about vehicle performance,” he said. “There’s a lot of understanding that we don’t have with regard to vehicle homologation so we’re bringing the experts in.”

Although still at the prototype stage, work has progressed quickly and Ashworth is confident that, should the need arise, Lockheed U.K. is not far away from producing a fully operational vehicle based on the AVA concept. “We think we’re mature enough to push for an opportunity if one were to arise next year,” he said.