Questions and Confusion as Trump Pauses Key Funding for Shrinking Colorado River
When President Donald Trump signed his first executive order, “Unleashing American Energy,” it didn’t seem to have a direct impact on how much water is in the Colorado River, at least in the short term.
The order, signed the first day Trump took office, aims to, “unleash America’s affordable and reliable energy and natural resources,” by ending “burdensome and ideologically motivated regulations.”
But the order also says, “All agencies shall immediately pause the disbursement of funds appropriated through the Inflation Reduction Act of 2022.”
“These are not ‘woke’ environmental programs,” said Anne Castle, who held federal water policy roles during the Biden and Obama administrations. “These are essential to continued ability to divert water.”
Water users whose grants have been paused said they are asking the federal government for more information and getting little in the way of answers. The federal agencies in charge of Western water did not respond to NPR’s requests for comment.
Conservation programs like the one sending money to California farmers have been key in boosting water supplies in major reservoirs. That is no small feat, as leaders of the states that use Colorado River water are caught in a legal standoff about how to share it going forward. They appear to be making little progress as they meet behind closed doors ahead of a 2026 deadline.
“Having this appropriated funding suddenly taken away undoes years and years of very careful collaboration among the states in the Colorado River Basin,” Castle said, “and threatens the sustainability of the entire system.”
In addition to those water conservation programs, the IRA set aside hundreds of millions of dollars for projects aimed at keeping Colorado River tributaries clean and healthy. Conservation groups, small nonprofits, Native American tribes, and local governments were assigned federal money for a bevy of projects that included wildfire prevention and habitat restoration.
Sonja Chavez, general manager of the Upper Gunnison River Water Conservancy District, was expecting that money to make its way to her group for river improvement projects in western Colorado.
“If there isn’t some resolution to the freeze or some additional guidance on what’s going to happen for folks,” she said. “We may have to put our entire programs on pause.”
Smaller watershed groups and their projects to restore and improve small sections of rivers are uniquely dependent on money from the federal government.
“Federal funding is critical because that’s the big money,” said Holly Loff, a grant writer in western Colorado and the former director of the Eagle River Watershed Council. “No one can really compete with those big dollars, or very few other entities besides the federal government can fund at those levels.”
Small groups dependent on that federal funding have been scrambling to come up with contingency plans since it has been paused, and some of their leaders say the gap would be difficult to fill with money from donors or local governments.
Loff said a continued pause on funding would cause a lot of financial pain for communities near the Colorado River — such as those with economies dependent on water-based recreation — and people far away, like those who buy produce grown with Colorado River water.
“Our economy is going to be impacted,” she said. “It’s just far-reaching. And I really can’t think of how anyone can avoid being impacted.”
Alex Hager is is KUNC’s reporter covering the Colorado River Basin. This story was originally published by Grist. You can subscribe to its weekly newsletter here.This story is part of ongoing coverage of water in the West, produced by KUNC in Colorado and supported by the Walton Family Foundation. KUNC is solely responsible for its editorial coverage.
